What is strategy?
IPlanning and strategy have a long history (Mintzberg, 1994: 6). Writing in 1916, Henri Fayol described having ten-yearly forecasts, revised every five years. Fayol supported the maxim that 'managing means looking ahead', regarding foresight as an essential part of management.
Mergers and Acquisitions - the HR Dimension
Read moreContact
Read moreLinks
Read moreHooked on books? BestBooks.biz features book-related articles, book extracts and book selections from the best books - past and present.
Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management
What is Strategy - And Does It Matter?
What is strategy?
Planning and strategy have a long history (Mintzberg, 1994: 6). Writing in 1916, Henri Fayol described having ten-yearly forecasts, revised every five years. Fayol supported the maxim that 'managing means looking ahead', regarding foresight as an essential part of management. Strategic thinking can occur at a number of levels. We have seen already that governments and multinational organizations can shape the future of whole economies and engage in strategic human resource planning at a macro level.
Mintzberg observes that, ironically, planning achieved its greatest importance in two of the most divergent societies on earth: the command economies of the communist world and in corporate America. However, many observers have argued that the Japanese economy is the best illustration of integrated government and corporate strategic planning (Whitehill, 1991: 256). Japan has targeted and supported successful industries but that success has not just been a matter of good fortune. 'Winners' have been created by means of strategic thinking and careful planning at a joint national and organizational level.
Chaffee (1985) considers that (academically) strategy is viewed in three distinct but sometimes conflicting ways: linear strategy, adaptive strategy, and interpretive strategy. The linear model has been used by most researchers and focuses on planning and forecasting. The second model is described as adaptive and most closely associated with âstrategic managementâ. This model âtends to focus the managerâs attention on meansâ and is largely concerned with âfitâ. The third, interpretative model, is a minority view that sees strategy as a metaphor and, therefore, it is not something which can be measured but is viewed in qualitative terms.
Mintzberg et al (1998) identified 10 âschoolsâ of strategy research which have developed since strategic management emerged as a field of study during the 1960s:
In his What is Strategy - And Does It Matter? (Thomson Learning, 2000), Richard Whittington identifies four main approaches:
The Classical approach - 'the oldest and still the most influential, relies on the rational planning method dominant in the textbooks.'
The Evolutionary approach - 'draws on the fatalistic metaphor of biological evolution, but substitutes the discipline of the market for the law of the jungle.'
The Processualist approach - emphasizes the 'sticky imperfect nature of all human life, pragmatically accommodating strategy to the fallible processes of both organizations and markets.
The Systemic approach - 'relativistic, regarding the ends and means of strategy as inescapably linked to the cultures and powers of the local systems in which it takes place.'
Whittington argues that these approaches differ in terms of the outcomes of strategy and the processes by which they are constructed. In terms of outcomes, the Classical and Evolutionary approaches view the maximization of profit as the outcome of strategy, whereas the other two approaches allow for additional outcomes other than profit. In terms of process, the pairings are different with Classical and Systemic approaches agreeing that strategy may be deliberate while Evolutionary and Processualist theorists see strategy as 'emerging from processes governed by chance, confusion and conservatism.'
Organizational Reality in Uncertain Times.
Michael E. Porter and the Notion of Strategy.
Strategic HRM.
Mergers and Acquisitions - the HR Dimension
Mergers and Acquisitions - Project Planning
Mergers and Acquisitions - some Definitions
Stakeholder theory
Strategy Articles and Books
References
Chaffee, E (1985) âThree models of strategyâ Academy of Management Review 10(1)89-98.
Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998), Strategy Safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management, The Free Press.
Whitehill, A.M. (1990), Japanese Management: Tradition and Transition, Routledge.
Whittington, R. (2000), What is Strategy - And Does It Matter?, 2nd edition Thomson Learning.
The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Page Links
- Best Books
- Biography
- Business
- Careers
- Fiction
- Food and Drink
- History
- Learning
- Psychology
- US Bestsellers
- UK Bestsellers
- France - Meilleurs Ventes
- Canada Bestsellers
- Germany Bestsellers
- Children's Books
- Communication Skills
- Computing Books
- Corporate Communications
- Entrepreneurship
- American History
- British History
- Canadian History
- Marketing Books
- Management Books
- Organization Books
- Strategy Books
- Organizational Reality in Uncertain Times
- Michael E. Porter and the Notion of Strategy
- Strategic HRM
- Mergers and Acquisitions - the HR Dimension
- Mergers and Acquisitions - Project Planning
- Stakeholder theory
- Contact
- Links
- Privacy Policy